STUDY: Smaller, dispersed sources account for majority of U.S. oil & gas methane emissions

Published Feb. 4, 2025

Efforts to locate, measure and reduce the planet-warming methane emissions from global oil and gas operations often focus on large, concentrated sources. But a growing body of research suggests that by not tracking smaller, dispersed sources, regulators, operators and scientists are missing a significant share of the emissions problem.

Now, a new study led by EDF scientists and published in the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics finds that of the roughly 15 million metric tons of methane coming from onshore oil and gas activities in the continental U.S. annually, 70% comes from smaller, dispersed sources emitting less than 100 kilograms of methane per hour. And fully 30% of emissions are from sites releasing less than 10 kilograms per hour.

At those rates, millions of tons of methane simply won’t show up under measurement methods not detecting those smaller sources of emissions.

Methane Super Emitter in the Barnett Shale

While tackling large, concentrated emission sources is important, focusing on them alone won’t help solve the industry’s methane problem unless we also account for the vast number of sites emitting at lower rates.

Our new study also finds that of the various activities, production well sites are responsible for 70% of the total regional oil and gas methane emissions. Among those well sites, 67-90% of emissions originate from lower-producing sites responsible for just 10% of total oil and gas production (based on 2021 data, the latest available).

The good news is, new instruments are coming online that can help. For example, MethaneSAT, developed by an EDF subsidiary with support from the Bezos Earth Fund and other donors and launched in March 2024, is specifically designed to quantify total regional emissions. It can detect large point sources as well as characterize the dominant smaller sources dispersed across large areas, mapping the full scope of emissions.

Looking wider

Numerous studies have focused on high-emitting sites (“super-emitters”), deeming them responsible for a large fraction of total methane emissions. However, facilities emitting at lower rates and their contributions to total emissions are not well understood, especially when assessing national- and regional-level emission totals.

To get a better sense of how smaller, dispersed sources contribute to overall emissions, we look at over 1,900 facility-level emission rates gathered using sensitive ground-based site- and component-level measurements from 16 previous studies. We combine these empirical measurements with detailed infrastructure data to estimate emission rates for each individual oil and gas facility in the U.S., which are then used to determine emissions at the basin- and national-level.

Handheld cameras can detect methane emissions at the facility level

Ground-based methods can detect emissions at 1 kg per hour or even less, but they lack the geographical reach of satellites or aircraft.

The overwhelming majority of these facilities were found to emit methane at rates less than 100 kg per hour, but in aggregate they contribute 70% of total methane emissions. For effective methane management and mitigation, these sources need to be accounted for.

Different regions, different pictures

Most of the nine biggest methane-emitting U.S. oil and gas basins show an even higher percentage contribution from lower emitting facilities (again, those under 100 kg per hour) compared to the national estimate of 70%.

Figures range from roughly 80% in the Permian, Appalachian, and Eagle Ford basins, up to near 90% in the oil-dominant San Joaquin basin. The Anadarko and Bakken basins fall below the national estimate, but lower emitting facilities still account for about 60% of total oil and gas methane.

The total estimated emissions across all lower-48 US basins amount to a loss rate of 2.4% across oil and gas producing regions (normalized to gross gas production), more than double the EPA Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report for natural gas and petroleum systems in 2021.

Our estimates are largely in line with the results from six out of seven prior studies that predominantly used satellite-derived data from the satellites GOSAT and TROPOMI to perform inversions that determined national estimates of methane emissions from US oil and gas production, with a combined average of 13 million metric tons per year.

At regional scales, our results are in broad agreement with data obtained from a suite of independent aerial remote sensing campaigns across major US oil and gas basins, which included MethaneAIR and other aerial platforms.

Important Implications

The new study looks only at the U.S., but additional research suggests similar patterns in some other oil and gas producing regions internationally. Understanding the total emissions from oil and gas basins, how the emissions are distributed at the site level, and the contributions of larger vs. smaller sources have direct policy implications for methane quantification and mitigation, such as the selection of measurement/screening methods and the required detection sensitivities.

Aerial or satellite platforms focused on high-emitting point-source detection can rapidly locate the relatively small number of larger concentrated sources, offering valuable data on specific facility locations that may allow for rapid mitigation. But additional observational approaches are critically needed to build a more complete picture of the overall emissions – one that our study suggests is dominated by smaller-emitting sources that are not effectively detected by high-emitting point source detection focused satellite and aerial systems.

MethaneSAT web portal reveals total emissions picture

MethaneSAT is specifically designed to quantify total regional emissions. It can detect large point sources as well as characterize the dominant smaller sources dispersed across large areas, mapping the full scope of emissions.

Dr. Ritesh Gautam

Lead Senior Scientist, MethaneSAT Science

Ritesh oversees the MethaneSAT science team at EDF. He leads satellite remote sensing efforts focusing on the global oil and gas sector using MethaneAIR and MethaneSAT observations. Previously, Ritesh was a research scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in the Climate and Radiation Laboratory with Universities Space Research Association and a tenured faculty member at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT Bombay). His experience is in satellite remote sensing of methane emissions, aerosols, clouds, snow and the climate effects of air pollution. Ritesh also serves as Co-Lead for the Atmospheric Composition and Asian Monsoon (ACAM) program. He has more than 70 scientific articles published in peer-reviewed literature.

Dr. James Williams

Postdoctoral Science Fellow, MethaneSAT Science

James Williams joined the MethaneSAT science team in June 2023. His work focuses on characterizing diffuse area methane emissions and developing emission distribution curves from the oil and gas sector. His previous research involved direct measurements and inventory development of methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells, gas distribution infrastructure, landfills, sewers, and urban water bodies. He earned his PhD at McGill University in Montreal, Canada.

Related Updates

Latest images demonstrate MethaneSAT's unique, powerful capabilities

New data show U.S. oil and gas methane emissions over four times higher than EPA estimates

Watch this TED Talk to see how MethaneSAT will protect the climate